"You can make a case either way. For me, I'd argue that he's both at once: though like the Wittgenstein duck/rabbit, at any one moment he seems one or the other."
For animal imagery, a blog post gave me a little better perspective of Shakespeare's using animals as every day images by comparing it to things we say today such as:
"Like a deer caught in headlights"-Surprised look.
"There is more than two ways to skin a catfish"-There is more than two ways to do something.
I also found reference to animal imagery in Macbeth, Othello, and King Lear. So it seems like I was correct in assuming that Shakespeare relies heavily on it in many of his works.
So what does any of this have to do with me?
Well like I said before, I'm newly exploring the idea of working with wildlife for the rest of my life. So my mind has been on animals for a while now. The idea of how animals and humans relate to each other and animals can portray human emotions and actions is fascinating to me. And for Shylock.. at the beginning of the year I posted about needing to find my self, and looking for characters with unsure identities. Shylock seems to fit this better than any other Shakespeare character. It is unsure on what side of our emotions he should be, whether pitied or hated, and his identity as a Jew is taken away from him when Antonio says he must become Christian or lose everything he owns. I don't think anyone could feel more confused with their identity than that..
Until next time, Hakuna Mutata:)
acorkin | October 24, 2011 at 9:41 AM
first off-loved the dog post. Twas very cool. secondly, i just read that speech that was something like, "if you prick us do we not bleed? if you tickle us do we not laugh?" you know that one, where Shylock is saying Jews are people too... I think that speech alone is so powerful against racism, the rest might almost be moot. Shakespeare creates a human, although villainous at some points, also victimized and thus multi-layered, multi-dementional human character. Not JUST an evil Jewish thing.